18 Nov, 2025
7 min read

Back to all posts >

A Guide to AI-Powered Taxonomy in CX
Shrinking the 'Other' Bucket; How to Balance Depth, Actionability, and AI

In today’s hyper-competitive marketplace, customer experience (CX) teams increasingly turn to text analytics to unlock actionable insights from unstructured feedback. From open-ended survey responses to social media mentions and chat transcripts, textual data holds a wealth of insights that can be mined, but only if you dive deep enough. Too often, we see new clients that rely on the off-the-shelf topic clusters or sentiment tags provided by their CX platforms, only to discover that these reactive, generic categories miss emerging issues, subtle nuances, and strategic opportunities.

In this post, we’ll explore how to calibrate the granularity of text-analytics taxonomy, recognize the point of diminishing returns, and proactively surface new topics using AI-driven approaches. We’ll also share a real-world example of how OGC Global partnered with a leading financial institution to completely overhaul their taxonomy and build an AI-powered tagging pipeline.

Why Granularity Matters

A taxonomy that’s too coarse can obscure important insights, lumping distinct customer concerns into broad “Other” buckets or generic labels like “Product.” Conversely, an overly granular taxonomy risks fragmentation; too many tiny categories dilute actionable patterns and overwhelm analysts. The sweet spot lies in defining topic dimensions that:

  • Align with Business Objectives. Your taxonomy should map directly to strategic priorities (e.g., “Onboarding Issues,” “Billing Transparency,” “Mobile App Performance”).
  • Strike Balance. Aim for 10–50 primary categories, each with up to 5–10 subcategories, depending on your volume of feedback and complexity of your business and customer base.
  • Ensure Coverage. Every comment should fit somewhere meaningful; if you see a growing “Other” bucket, it’s a signal to refine or add categories.
  • Maintain Coherence. Categories should be mutually exclusive and semantically distinct, avoiding overlap that can confuse both humans and algorithms.

By calibrating granularity around these principles, you empower your CX team to spot patterns that matter: whether it’s an otherwise unseen spike in “Mobile App Crashes” after a new release or emerging concerns about delays in getting two-factor authentication texts.

Signs You’ve Gone Deep Enough

How can you tell that your taxonomy is “just right”? Look for these indicators:

  • Stable Category Distribution. After several weeks of feedback, the percentage of comments in each category should stabilize. Wild swings or persistent “Other” growth signals that definitions need to be revisited.
  • Analyst Consensus. If multiple analysts consistently agree on category assignments, your taxonomy is clear and intuitive. High inter-rater variability indicates confusion or overlap.
  • Actionable Insights. Categories should directly map to potential business actions or hypotheses. If you’re tagging comments under a label that has no clear follow-up (e.g., “Miscellaneous”), it’s time to refine or retire it.
  • Model Performance. In AI-driven tagging, monitor model metrics like precision and recall for each topic category. Categories with low performance may need more training examples, clearer definitions, or to be merged with adjacent topics.

When these criteria are met, you’ve likely struck the right balance: your taxonomy is granular enough to detect meaningful shifts, yet streamlined enough to drive decisions.

Why Built-In CX Tools Aren’t Enough

Most CX platforms today offer some level of native text-analytics modules that extract topics, sentiment, and basic themes. While convenient, they commonly suffer from:
 

  • Reactive Clustering. Topics are generated based on past data, making it hard to spot new issues until they’re already widespread.
  • Generic Labels. Auto-generated clusters often yield broad labels like “Service,” “Experience,” or “Price,” which obscure the root causes of sentiment changes.
  • Limited Customization. Many tools lock you into predefined taxonomies or offer only surface-level customization, preventing deep dives into niche concerns.
  • Static Models. Without ongoing retraining, models degrade over time as customer language and product features evolve.
Stop reacting to yesterday's data. Anticipate tomorrow's insights with AI-driven taxonomy that evolves as fast as your customers do.
A Proactive, AI-Driven Approach

Here’s a blueprint for elevating your text analytics:

  1. Initial Taxonomy Workshop. Collaborate with stakeholders (product owners, support leads, data scientists, etc.) to draft an initial taxonomy aligned with the organization’s goals.
  2. Retrospective Retagging. Use an LLM-based model to retag historical feedback (e.g., tens of thousands of comments), ensuring consistency and completeness. This creates a large, high-quality training dataset.
  3. Model Training & Validation. Train a supervised classification model using a transformer or fine-tuned LLM and validate its performance against a smaller, human-annotated test set.
  4. Automated Pipeline. Deploy the model in your feedback ingestion pipeline: every new comment is tagged in real time, with confidence scores and fallback rules for low-confidence cases.
  5. Continuous Taxonomy Refinement. Schedule monthly or quarterly reviews to identify gaps, add or merge categories, and retrain the model with fresh annotations.
  6. Emerging Topic Detection. Layer on unsupervised topic-modeling (e.g., dynamic LDA or embeddings clustering) to surface nascent themes or trends that haven’t yet been codified in your taxonomy.

This approach transforms text analytics from a reactive afterthought into a strategic intelligence engine, fueling proactive product improvements, support triage, and executive reporting.

OGC Global in Action: Financial Institution Case Study

The Challenge. Our client, a major financial institution, had accumulated over 75,000 survey responses with open-ended comments. Their legacy taxonomy consisted of a handful of generic labels like “Service,” “Pricing,” “Online Banking,” and an ever-growing “Other” bucket. Insights were shallow, and they had analysts spend hours manually sifting through “Other” to find emerging issues and verbatims to include in executive reports.

Our Solution. OGC Global partnered with the CX team to:

  1. Co-Create a Strategic Taxonomy. We facilitated workshops with product, support, and risk teams to define a taxonomy of 20 primary categories (e.g., “Account Opening Delays,” “Mobile App Login Errors,” “Fee Transparency”), each with 5–8 subcategories.
  2. Retrospective AI-Powered Retagging. Leveraging a fine-tuned LLM, we retagged all 75,000 historical comments. The model achieved an average F1-score of over .8 across categories, enabling confident automation.
  3. Real-Time Tagging Pipeline. We built a scalable inference pipeline using serverless functions through Google Cloud Platform. New comments are automatically tagged within seconds of a survey response, with fallback to human review for model confidence below 0.75.
  4. Emerging Theme Monitoring. We integrated an unsupervised clustering module that runs weekly on untagged text clusters, alerting analysts to new topics like “ID Verification Frustrations” that spiked after a platform upgrade.

Results. Within three months, the “Other” bucket shrank from 18% to under 5%. The CX team identified and triaged three critical pain points, two of which had never been logged in their legacy system. Quarterly NPS improved as product teams quickly resolved “Mobile App Login Errors” that had previously flown under the radar.

Best Practices for Sustainable Text Analytics

To replicate this success in your organization:

  • Governance & Ownership. Assign a taxonomy steward responsible for quarterly reviews and version control.
  • Human-in-the-Loop. Even the best AI models require spot checks; set up regular audits and feedback loops.
  • Cross-Functional Collaboration. Taxonomy design isn’t just a data exercise; it requires input from support, product, marketing, and legal teams.
  • Scalability. Architect your pipeline to handle growing volumes. Consider serverless or containerized deployments.
  • Metrics & Monitoring. Track tagging accuracy, category distribution, and “Other” bucket size as your core health metrics.
Conclusion

Effective text analytics in CX goes well beyond the default capabilities of most platforms. By thoughtfully calibrating your taxonomy’s granularity, proactively leveraging AI to retag historical data, and setting up a continuous refinement process, you can surface deep insights, detect emerging trends, and drive strategic improvements. At OGC Global, we’ve seen firsthand how an AI-powered, governance-driven approach transforms unstructured feedback into a competitive advantage: turning otherwise unused comments into clear, actionable intelligence that elevates the entire customer journey.

 

Marc Rauckhorst, Director, Data Science

You may also like…

Skip to content